Wednesday, 14 February 2024

The King; his Heir Apparent…and The Pharaoh waiting in the wings

Shearer, Kane and Salah, games and goals per season, updated to the end of the 2022-2023 season 

In the first post in the series I compared the games per season, goals per game and goals per possible game for Alan Shearer, the Premier League's all time top scorer, and Harry Kane and Mo Salah, the two players who had the best change of beating his record back in 2021 when L first had the idea. 

At the end of the post, I suggested two bits of future work; to update the stats at the end of each season, and to then look at Erling Haaland's numbers in comparison. This post covers the first of those two bits of future work, a second one with Haaland's data is in the works. 

Comparing Shearer, Kane and Salah using data up to the end of the 2022-2023 season 

Looking at percentage of games played in only up to the point where all 3 players are 29, it looks like this. Dot plot with the dots joined by dotted lines the same colour as the dots.  Blue dots are Alan Shearer,  orange are Harry Kane and silver is Mo Salah.  The Shearer curve bends sharply to the lowest point of any of the three, stopping at 80 percent of games played.  His curve is pulled down by having played few games when he was 27.  The Salah curve has a very similar shape but stops at 85 percent.  The Kane curve is also a parabola but is still rising when he reaches 29.  At 29, his curve is at 90 percent. 

It's now the Salah and Shearer curves that are the most similar. 

Shearer's curve is being brought down by the ankle injury when he was 27, while Salah's is being brought down by the relatively lower percentage of games he played last season. Possibly because Tottenham Hotspur relied so much on him, so played him a lot, Kane's curve is not dropping. 

If we use all the data from Shearer's career, and then extrapolate from the data available for up to 29 years of age for Kane and 30 for Salah the curves look like this: Dot plot with the dots joined by dotted lines the same colour as the dots.  Blue dots are Alan Shearer,  orange are Harry Kane and silver is Mo Salah.  All three are parabolas.  The Shearer curve starts at 0 percent, reaches a maximum of about 85 percent at the age of 31, and then drops to about 79 percent at 35.  The Kane curve starts at 20 percent, reaches a maximum of about 90 percent at the age of 30 and then drops to 80 percent at 35.  The Salah curve starts at 14 or 15 percent, reaches a maximum of 92 or 93 percent between 27 and 28 years of age, and then drops to about 64 percent at 35. Salah's curve is really affected by the way the extrapolation handles the relatively few games he played at age 29, but the curve shape going forward is going to heavily depend on how many games he plays this year. 

Looking at goals per game, up to the age of 29, the curves look like this: Dot plot with the dots joined by dotted lines the same colour as the dots.  Blue dots are Alan Shearer,  orange are Harry Kane and silver is Mo Salah.  All three are parabolas, but the Salah curve is almost a straight line.  The Shearer curve starts at about -0.1 goals per game, reaches a maximum of about 0.62 goals per game at age 25, then drops to 0.56 goals per game at 29.  The Kane curve starts at about 0.19 goals per game, reaches a maximum of 0.7 goals per game at about age 26 and then drops to 0.61 goals per game at 29.  The Salah curve starts at -0.1, and is still increasing when it ends at 0.61 at 29 years of age. The three curves are very similar to last year's. Shearer's is still brought down by the limited number of goals he could score at the age of 27 when he had an ankle injury, but you can also see him recovering from that, and the goals per game rising back up again. 

The different shape of Salah's curve reflects him being repurposed from a winger to a striker, while the other two have always been out and out strikers. 

If we look at all the data, the curves look like this: Dot plot with the dots joined by dotted lines the same colour as the dots.  Blue dots are Alan Shearer,  orange are Harry Kane and silver is Mo Salah.  The Shearer curve starts at 0.5 to 0.6 goals per game, reaches a maximum of 0.61 goals per game at 27 years of age, and then ends at 0.35 goals per game at 35.  The Kane curve starts at 0.19 goals per game, reaches a maximum of 0.68 to 0.7 between 25 and 26, and ends at 0.27 at 35.  The Salah curve starts at 0, reaches a maximum of 0.61 between 30 and 31 and then drops to 0.56 at 35. Previously, the shape of the curves was really different, with Shearer and Kane having parabolas and Salah's being a steadily rising straight line. The relative drop off in goals per game in the last two years for Salah is probably what's bending his curve now. 

Salah's curve still doesn't drop as much as the other two, possibly reflecting the steady rise after he switched from winger to striker. Kane's numbers are hurt by the dip in goals per game at the age of 28. 

The goals per possible game metric was added to account for Shearer's Newcastle having fewer games so less likelihood of him being rested. Up to age 29, it looks like this. Dot plot with the dots joined by dotted lines the same colour as the dots.  Blue dots are Alan Shearer,  orange are Harry Kane and silver is Mo Salah.  The Shearer curve starts at -0.4 goals per possible game, reaches a maximum of 0.6 goals per possible game at 26, then drops to 0.48 goals per possible game at age 29.  The Kane curve starts at -0.05, rises to a maximum of 0.55 at 27, then drops slightly to 0.54 at 29.  The Salah curve starts at -0.1 and is still rising to 0.6 goals per game at the age of 29. Shearer and Kane's curves resemble each other, while Salah's is a completely different shape, again, an artefact of his role changing. 

If all the available data is used, it looks like this: Dot plot with the dots joined by dotted lines the same colour as the dots.  Blue dots are Alan Shearer,  orange are Harry Kane and silver is Mo Salah.  The Shearer curve starts at 0, rises to a maximum of 0.52 goals per possible game at 26 and then drops to 0.29 at 35.  The Kane curve starts at 0, rises to a maximum of 0.58 goals per possible game between 26 and 27 and then drops to 0.28 at 35.  The Salah curve starts at 0, rises to a maximum of 0.6 goals per possible game at 33 and then drops slightly by 35. This is one where there's been a major change, with Kane's curve no longer dropping like a stone, which it did last year (I still blame Antonio Conte). 

I think the changes show the value of continuing to look at this at the end of each season. Obviously a couple of things have happened this season which will affect these plots going forward; Kane moving to Bayern Munich and Salah missing some Liverpool games playing for Egypt at the African Cup of Nations. That hasn't affected Salah's numbers before but since he got injured, it may have a greater effect this time. 

Kane leaving for Bayern almost certainly means he won't break Shearer's record. I'll still look at his stats, because I've included Salah's Fiorentina spell in the stats, but I acknowledge it'll no longer be a direct comparison because of the difference between the English and German leagues. 

Salah is now the active Premiership player closest to Shearer's record, he's on 153 goals, while Shearer finished on 260. The next nearest active player on the list is Raheem Sterling on 120 goals.

Tuesday, 6 February 2024

Andalusia 2019 - Part 11 - Granada

The day after the Alhambra, on our last day in Andalusia we visited Granada (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granada). As you could see from the last photo in the last post, the Granada really does surround the Alhambra. 

View of the Alhambra from Granada: View of the Alhambra from Granada 

Granada was the fourth city we visited and the fourth completely different vibe. 

Granada had a much wider range of building styles, and some really cool lampposts: Modernist lamppost, the fitting around the bulb is a square broken down into smaller shapes.  It is both unusual looking and very cool. 

This is just an ordinary building, I liked the tree striving to survive: Corner of a pebble wall at the bottom of a hill of houses.  There is some graffiti on the white wall to the left, and a green tree growing out of the join between the white wall and the pebble wall. 

While I think the decoration at the top of this building is neat, it loses something without the rest of the building so have the building and then the close up shot: Yellow white multi-storey stone building, with the top window guarded by two angels and an eagle Close up of yellow white stone angels and the eagle 

Mudejar arch at the end of a row of shops: Left and right are rows of shops.  In the front of the photo are people walking along the street.  At the back is an orange stone arch in mudejar style. 

There was also a fascinating statue of Isabella the Catholic (unfortunately, I am foreign enough that I think of her as Isabella the Catholic. I am sure she actually has a regnal number and stuff). Statue of Christopher Colombus kneeling in front of Isabella the Catholic.  The plinth is an off white stone, the figures are in bronze.  Isabella dress cascades down the front of the plinth in ripples. 

I've never seen the ripple effect done by different colour material on such a large statue before. More information on the statue, and that it helped cause a riot, here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monument_to_Isabella_the_Catholic_(Granada) 

Their Catholic majesties (don't look at me in that tone of voice) were pretty much the theme of the day as we spent most of our time in the Royal Chapel of Granada (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Chapel_of_Granada) which contains the tombs of Isabella and Ferdinand, as well as Joanna of Castile and Philip the Handsome. And some very cool artwork. 

It is an understandably fancy building, in what I've been told is Isabelline style, a variant on late Gothic. Pictures of the building
  Carved triptych over a door.  The two saints are probably Saint John the Baptist and Saint John the Evangelist surrounding a Virgin and child.  The roof behind it features lots of twisty gothicness. 

Because they get everywhere, I also suspect this of being a Hapsburg eagle holding the coat of arms of Isabella and Ferdinand.
  Decoration at the top of a door.  It is the side of an eagle holding a shield.  The design on the shield cannot quite be clearly seen. 

 We didn't get to see the San Juan de Dios Hospital (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Juan_de_Dios_Hospital_(Granada)), which was our tour guide's favourite site in Granada (and may have been her favourite in all of Andalusia, Sharon being awesome that way), nor did we manage to have any tapas in the home of tapas (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tapas#Origin), but, all in all, it was a very successful trip, and I would recommend a visit to Andalusia to everyone.

Saturday, 27 January 2024

Andalusia 2019 - Part 10 - the Alhambra

The reason for our prompt departure from Antequera was that we had tickets to enter the Alhambra in the afternoon. 

Much like the Alcazar in Seville, it's the sort of place where you stick to your slot. 

It didn't feel as busy, but I think that's because it's built over a much bigger area. A much, much bigger area. There's a reason it's described as the Alhambra complex in lots of books. 

The Alhambra was the main reason we went on holiday to Spain. Mum had always wanted to go, and spurred on by her friend J's wise words of advice to "just go for it," I decided to take her. It was totally worth it. 

The route the guide took us in took us via the Palace of Charles V (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palace_of_Charles_V), which was very impressive, even if it didn't fit it with anything else.
  Circular building, open to the sky, with regular pillars.  Guide books describe it as renaissance-style. 

We wandered through the Alhambra at quite a pace, so yes, this is also on the "to be revisited" list. 

The Alhambra pays thanks to Washington Irving with a plaque. Stone plaque dedicated to Washington Irving.  It says "Washington Irving, escribo en estas habitaciones sus cuentos de la Alhambra en el ano de 1829."  Which translates to something like "Washington Irving wrote his stories of the Alhambra here in the year 1829. 
My terrible translation of this is "Washington Irving wrote his stories of the Alhambra here in the year 1829". 

We saw the Court of the Myrtles. 

Fuller information about this courtyard can be found here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_the_Myrtles
Very mudejar-style building.  There is a very plain tower in the background, the Comares tower.  There are arches which separate the walkway around the courtyard from the courtyard.  The stonework is intricately decorated.  There are tiles on the wall to about midway, and the rest is white painted.  There is a row of myrtle bushes in the foreground. 

The plain tower in the background is the Comares tower, and those bushes are the titular myrtles. 

We saw the Court of the Lions: 

Meet some lions A fountain basin surrounded by stylised lions.  The lions go all the way around, from this angle, you can see either of them.  In the background are arches and a lot of tourists. 

For further information on the Court of the Lions, please see here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_the_Lions 

The ceiling of the Sala de los Abencerrajes was possible the most intricate thing we saw all trip. Elaborately carved ceiling, a proper description is immediately below, written by someone who knows what they are talking about Borrowing the description from Wikipedia - "It is covered by an elaborate muqarnas vault ceiling, featuring a 16-sided lantern cupola in the shape of an eight-pointed star, possibly symbolizing the celestial heaven." 

My less technical take is "imagine beautiful inverted termite mounds". 

There is an even prettier ceiling in the Sala de Dos Hermanas, but I was particular taken by the interplay of the muqarnas ceilings and the stained glass in the Mirador. The muqarnas ceiling, which, as I said, looks like the most beautiful inverted termite mounds, takes up the top third of the picture.  They are white with blue highlights.  The centre of the next third is the stained glass, which is red, blue, green and yellow with the expected black lead lining.  The remainder of the photo is the white and blue detailed walls. 

The rest of my photos are outdoor photos.

View of the Partal palace 

  There are pine trees on both sides of the photo.  In the front is a patio that leads out onto bushes.  In the middle is a brown building.  The right hand side is one storey, the left hand, two storeys.  The front is mostly arches. 

View over to the Generalife: 

Details of this palace here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalife The foreground is dominated by gardens, and particularly a pine tree about a third of the way in from the left.  In the background is a white multi-storey building, which is the generalife. 
View back from the Generalife: View from the white building in the last picture over to the rest of the Alhambra complex.  The brown towers of the buildings are interspersed by trees.

We did get to walk over to the Generalife, and the view back helps show how big the whole Alhambra complex is. 

 The Alhambra really is surrounded by Grenada, as can be seen from this photo: View over part of Grenada.  The buildings are white walled and have orange tiled roofs. 

And that was where we went the next day.

Friday, 19 January 2024

Andalusia 2019 - Part 9 - Antequera

The day after Cadiz, we spent the morning in Antequera, which is a delightfully named town which became even more evocative when the tour guide explained it was called that because it was old when the Romans came. 

Local tourism board - https://antequera.co.uk/ 
Andalusian tourism board - https://www.andalucia.org/en/antequera 

We arrived near the Tourist Office and walked along to one of the squares which had some pretty fountains: Four water fountains, with the spouts coming out of faces.  Behind them are three storey white buildings. Bronze animal head that is also a fountain.  It is probably supposed to be a lion, but might be a bear.  The artist was trying, alright. 

From there, we walked up the hill to the arch of the giants, created for Philip II of Spain. Big stone arch.  On the left hand side is some sort of fir/pine tree.  The stone arch is as high as them.  It is about 7 metres high. 

Past the arch lies the Real Colegiata de Santa MarĂ­a la Mayor (https://www.andalucia.org/en/antequera-cultural-tourism-real-colegiata-de-santa-maria-la-mayor) Very pointy renaissance church.  There is a statue outside it and fir/pine trees on both sides. 

I also managed to get probably my best photo technically of the trip, capturing the flag fluttering in the breeze. White flag fluttering in the breeze against a blue sky with clouds.  There is a heraldic lion in black on the flag. From the top of the hill you could get a very nice view over the whole town. A view down some steps.  On the two sides are white painted houses with orange tiled roofs.  In the centre of the stairs is a fir tree.  In the distance is an orange stone church. Photo over the top of more orange tiled houses.  In the centre is another church, the top of bell tower is in a black stone 

There is a distinctly large number of churches per square foot. According to the tourism board it has the highest churches per person in Spain, and I could believe it. In a panorama shot that didn't quite come out, unfortunately, I managed to get 15 church spires in one shot.

Have a detail from one of them   Thick wooden church door with a niche above it.  In the niche is a statue of the Virgin Mary. 

I must admit my favourite bit of decoration was this graffiti. White wall, with a very basic drawing of a planet with something orbiting it.  Underneath is something that says something like Me siento astronauta pendida en los lunanes, which google translates as I feel like an astronaut hanging in the moon 
The next photo is from the top of the hill too. In the distance, you can see a hill that looks like a man's face coming out of the ground. The hill is called the Lover's Rock (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pe%C3%B1a_de_los_Enamorados) and has the exact star-crossed lover's throwing themselves off of it stories you'd imagine. A panorama of white walled houses with orange tiled roofs.  At the front are the black metal rails of a balcony.  In the distance is a mountain that looks like the face of a giant lying down. 

We had a very nice lunch in the town square, and then on to our next destination.

Saturday, 13 January 2024

Andalusia 2019 - Part 8 - Cadiz

Cadiz was a completely different vibe after Cordoba

Partly it was the temperature difference. Cordoba was the other side of 30oC, while Cadiz, being on the coast, was a good 5-10 degrees cooler. Seafront brick wall with old fashioned street lamps.  This runs along the left of the photo. The top right is the sky and the bottom right is the sea. 

In Cordoba we had a walk through little twisty streets and looked at flowery courtyards. In Cadiz, we stayed pretty much along the main streets which were much broader. 

On the other hand, they are not broad enough for tourist coaches when you're sent on diversions. Coach driver earned every penny that day. Multi-storey building.  White fronted, there are four windows with no frames on each floor, with a balcony on either end of the floor.  At the bottom are the tops of palm trees, and top there is a three-columned older style top with bronze winged victory on top.  Towards the bottom of the building is a black sign saying Diario de Cadiz with a red line underneath. 

The Diario de Cadiz is a local newspaper. I just liked the building.

This is a view of the Plaza del la Cathedral and the "new" cathedral.  Front of a sort of mudejar-baroque mixture cathedral.  The stone is in three bands, a white bottom, a more orange-y middle then a white top. 

Because my entire family are contrary, and it was on the the way to the Roman Amphitheatre, we looked in the old Cathedral instead. It very much feels like a working church and was absolutely lovely and welcoming. I am therefore linking the following to encourage others to go to the Iglesia de Santa Cruz also (https://turismo.cadiz.es/es/rutas-y-visitas-en-cadiz/iglesia-de-santa-cruz-catedral-vieja , https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iglesia_de_Santa_Cruz_(C%C3%A1diz)).

This is a shot of the back of the old cathedral, taken from the amphitheatre.
Photo of the back of the old cathedral.  In the centre is a white tower with an orange dome.  On the left is a more pointy white tower, with a figure on the roof.  I 

For those who don't know, my Spanish is terrible. In my defence, I never studied it at school, so it's me using a phrase book and some guessing. The other problem is that the Romance language I did study at school was French, so I start sentences with Spanish intentions but they descend into French with unfortunate speed. 

So, when we got lost on the way to the amphitheatre, I was quite pleased I managed to make myself understood enough to get us to where we wanted to go. View from the right hand side of the amphitheatre looking across.  The tower you can see in the middle of the other wall is the tower of the old cathedral. View down into the centre of the amphitheatre.  The arches at the back have been reinforced with reddish metal. 


My fondness for Roman history meant that I wanted to visit, and it's worth it (free entry). 

I have walked where Caesar watched. 

It still makes me quite giddy. 

(Yes, before L says anything, my fondness for Roman archaeology has since caused much misery. I regret nothing.) 

After lunch, we walked round a little more and found the Plaza de España and the monument to the Constitution of 1812. We didn't have quite enough time to explore it thoroughly, so Cadiz is also on the "I want to go back" list.

Three photos of the monument in question   White pillar with Cadiz written along the top.  At the top are four figures holding up a book which I suspect is the 1812 constitution Fuller view of the same pillar.  You can now see the figures around the bottom.  At the left is what looks like one man on a horse surrounded on the others.  On the right, it looks like a king also on a horse.  At the front is a naked man with fabric round him. 

 A view of the other side of the monument: This side says 1812 instead of Cadiz, and there is a female figure in a blue robe.  Given her helmet and sword, I am presuming it is Minerva or Athena. 

There's lots of allegorical figures. Hopefully this link provides more information - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monument_to_the_Constitution_of_1812 

With that it was back to the hotel in Seville for the last time.

Monday, 8 January 2024

My top 10 films of 2023 - now with explanations

In 2023, I watched 12 new films in the cinema. 

I was on track for more, but then I broke my leg. A determination to watch Napoleon was on of the things that helped get me out of the house. 

The very best film I saw last year was Blue, which I saw with R as part of the Horrorshow exhibition (https://www.somersethouse.org.uk/whats-on/the-horror-show) [fuller review of the show eventually].

If we agree that art is trying to convey experience through a medium, Blue is exceptional. It's undoubtedly one of the greatest works of art I've seen in any medium. 

The chance to see things like that, so utterly better than any of this year's films (most year's films), is why I have a separate category for films not released in that year. 

I was also lucky enough to see Dr. Strangelove and Grand Budapest Hotel at the Electric Cinema (https://www.electricbirmingham.com/) 

For films released this year, I am applying my usual 4 criteria: 
a – did the film do what it set out to do? 
b – did it use its resources to its best ability? A £250,000 film is not going to have as good explosions as a £25,000,000 film, or it shouldn’t, and if it does, there’s something wrong with the £25,000,000 film. Basically, it's a technical merit score. 
c – Intellectual satisfaction – does the film’s plot pull some really stupid move at the last moment? Does the plot rely on characters being more stupid than they are? 
d – Does this work as a whole? Did it work for me? I am aware that this is the most subjective of subjective criteria! 

1 - Polite Society 

This gets both style and ridiculousness points, and extra bonus points for Eunice Huthart (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunice_Huthart) [every girl my age wanted to be Eunice Huthart when we grew up] and introducing me to Nimra Bucha. It also get a bonus for not being based on a pre-existing media property. 

2 - Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning 

If you'd told me that Mission Impossible 7 would be one of the freshest films I'd see all year I would have laughed at you. It is still a series of action set pieces barely held together with a plot and the lead villain is miscast, and everything I loved about Elsa Faust's fight choreography in Fallout (https://fulltimesportsfan.wordpress.com/2019/04/06/mission-impossible-fallout-is-solid-but-the-fight-scenes-are-exceptional/) this one got wrong. 

On the other hand, Vanessa Kirby, Rebecca Ferguson, Henry Cserny and Shea Whigham's Briggs. I am so easily pleased. 

3 - Across the Spiderverse 

It's not Across the Spiderverse's fault it's not as good as Into the Spiderverse. Unfortunately, some of it did feel like filler when they realised that they'd made one and a half films and they needed to turn it into two. I also really don't like cliffhangers. 

4 - Guardians of the Galaxy 3 

Was it "a bit much"? Yes. Does James Gunn need someone to shout "no" at him? Yes. 

On the other hand, did I go in knowing that? Yes. Did various bits of it, not least of all Teefs, break me in the way James Gunn always breaks me? Yes. 

It was horrific, in a way this sort of film often isn't, but probably should be. It also had the best explanation of why I skew Marvel rather than DC - "everyone deserves a second chance." 

5 - Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem 

Could I have done without the romance? Yes. Other than that, it was pleasing Turtle-y nonsense. 

6 - Antman and the Wasp: Quantumania 

To return to the cake metaphor I first used for the first of the Fantastic 4 films, bad superhero films are like bad cake. Yeah, it's bad, but it's still cake. 

And this was only mediocre cake, not actively bad cake. I didn't like what they did with MODOK, and it was too obviously setting up Wave 4 rather than being its own film (see also my problems with Stephen Strange 1 and 2) and there wasn't enough of team minor criminal, but it was bland not bad. 

7 - Indiana Jones 5 

I know what they were trying to do, it just didn't work for me. Sallah steals the film entirely. 

8 - Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Amongst Thieves 

I am the problem with this one. 

My first exposure to D&D was Neverwinter Nights so I totally squeaked when they moved around Neverwinter, and when I play that I almost always play a lady barbarian so Holga, entirely my speed, ditto Doric. 

On the other hand, it was just too ironical for my tastes. I find irony fine seasoning but a poor main course. 

9 - John Wick 4 

The problems with John Wick 4 were accidentally caused by John Wick 3. That was a series of excellent set pieces barely held together by some excellent acting. In this one, the thread holding the action set pieces didn't work, because John spent 3 desperately trying to find the Elder, only for spoiler to happen at the start of this. 

Okay, given spoiler, ragnarok is coming for the High Table. I could get behind that. 

Only then they don't do that either. The plot made no sense!!! 

10 - Three Musketeers: D'Artagnan/Three Musketeers: Milady 

If this ranking was just based on the acting, the set design and the lighting, these films would be in second. 

The directing would have moved them down anyway (directors, we have steady cam, use it). 

And then we hit the screenplay. May the good Lord grant me the self-confidence of someone who adapts one of the most popular books in the world, one which has been consistently popular since its release, and then changes every single bit of the plot. By the end of the second film, it wasn't even suggested by Dumas anymore. 

Also, given they changed everything, one of the revelations in part 2 means someone's actions in part 1 make no sense, and it's just urgh! 

I can happily recommend everything down to 3, would say 4-8 depend on people's likes and dislikes, and several of them have been moved around in this ranking every time I sat down to update it, while 9 and 10 had serious flaws.

Saturday, 6 January 2024

Andalusia 2019 - Part 7 - Cordoba

There aren't quite as many photos of Cordoba on my camera because in the process of going OTT on photos of the Alcazar in Seville, I filled up my memory card. This has since been solved by buying a much bigger memory card, but at the time, I had to try to quickly delete photos from the memory card I had to make space. It also means two of the photos came from my phone camera. 

St. Raphael is Cordoba's patron saint and protector (https://sientecordoba.com/en/st-raphaels-day/) so there are lots of statues of St. Raphael. My photo of one of them, which features a monster being speared by St. Raphael on side didn't come out quite right, but you get the general idea. A white stone statue of St. Raphael on top of a pillar.  On the near side of a pillar a monster that looks like a dragon is climbing up. 

Possibly the most famous site in Cordoba is the Mezquita (or Mosque-Cathedral, depending who is doing the translating) - https://mezquita-catedraldecordoba.es/en/ 

Two photos of the outside of the Mezquita On the left hand side is another very pretty building with regular towers.  I think it is a more modern construction.  On the right hand side is the golden stone of the outside of the Mezquita.  It is very square with regular crenulations.  On the outside, you can see what were the entrance of the mosque. The doorway nearest the front of the photo may be the Bab al-Wuzara ("Viziers' Gate"), now known as the Puerta de San Esteban. It is one of the oldest surviving gates of the mosque and dates from 855. Balcony on the Mezquita.  The decorations around the balcony are very mosque, the balcony is very Gothic church. 

I'd read about it and I thought I understood. It was a mosque, and then after the reconquista they turned it into a church. So I was expecting a mosque with church insides. 

That is not what the Mezquita is like. 

Imagine they'd listed the features you'd expect from a mosque and the features you'd expect in a church and written them on cards, then shuffled the cards and built according to the first half a deck drawn. 

And I was mostly getting my head around that when I hit the Renaissance bit (https://mezquita-catedraldecordoba.es/en/descubre-el-monumento/el-edificio/capilla-mayor-crucero-y-coro/). Quite frankly, I thought I was having heat stroke. 

Every part is beautiful, and the mixture is unique. I thoroughly recommend seeing it for yourself because the pictures do not convey the effect of the mixture. (The pictures in the Wikipedia page do give an excellent taster though - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosque%E2%80%93Cathedral_of_C%C3%B3rdoba). 

As part of the coach trip, we got a guided walking tour of Cordoba, which was very much worth it, and very recommended because Cordoba is a very pretty city. 

Due to the heat, many of the houses are built around courtyards, a concept introduced by Moors. Every year there is a Courtyard Flower Festival (https://www.turismodecordoba.org/-en-1-1), which we were far too late for in September, but many of the owners kindly leave the shutters open so you can peek in and see the beautiful interiors. (This, according to the Alhambra tour, was also a style picked up from the Moors, plain outside, pretty inside.) As I said, unfortunately, I ran out of memory card space, so please see a few highlights I was able to capture. Door with a stencilled image of Mary Red and white painted arches in a courtyard behind a church.  At the top of the picture, two out of three church bells can be seen.  They are also in arches.  In the foreground are trees.  One, on the right, is very small. Two white-walled houses, with a few tree branches coming in the left hand side of the image.  The house on the left has yellow window frames.  Between the two houses you can see the top of the tower of the Mezquita. More white walled houses.  These have flower pots hanging outside along the wall.  Again, the Mezquita can be seen in the gap between the houses. 

Before the Expulsion of the Jews, Cordoba also had a sizable Jewish population. Only one synagogue survived from before the Expulsion, and it is now open as a museum. 

Photo of the inside as it's no longer an active place of worship: Photo of the inside of the synagogue, it is also decorated in Mudejar style, like many of the local buildings. 

For more information - https://www.turismodecordoba.org/synagogue https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/cultura/enclaves/enclave-monumental-sinagoga-de-cordoba and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C3%B3rdoba_Synagogue 

Maimonides is from Cordoba, and has a statue near the synagogue. Metal statue of Maimonides.  He is wearing a cloth cap and a robe.  The metal is a dark brown, but there are golden glints where it is worn.  This is particularly strong on the feet of Maimonides, the bottom edge of his beard and robe, and around the book he is holding. 

(A better photo, or at least one without a crowd in front can be seen here - https://www.andalucia.org/en/cordoba-cultural-tourism-monumento-a-maimonides) 

Nearby, there is also a bust of Muhammad ibn Aslam Al-Ghafiqi (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_ibn_Aslam_Al-Ghafiqi). White stone bust on a grey-green stone plinth.  Al-Ghafiqi is also wearing a cloth cap and a robe. 

I had a great time in Cordoba.

Monday, 1 January 2024

My top 10 films of 2023

 As usual, this top 10 is just the new films this year (which does somewhat give away that I will be talking a lot about at least one not-new film in the expanded post with my reasonings).

I have moved everything from 6-11 of these round every time I've written this list so some of them might change again.

The film that didn't make the top 10 of the 11 films I saw in 2011 is Napoleon, which was every bit as bad as you have been told, but was visually better than most of the other films.

I can only truly recommend the top 2 films (don't get me wrong, I loved Across the Spiderverse, but I do not approve of cliffhangers).  I enjoyed everything down to 6, and and am willing to admit the virtues of everything down to 8.

1 - Polite Society

2 - Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning

3 - Across the Spiderverse

4 - Guardians 3

5 - Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem

6 - Antman and the Wasp: Quantumania

7 - Indiana Jones 5

8 - Dungeons and Dragons

9 - John Wick 4

10 - Three Musketeers: D'Artagnan/Three Musketeers: Milady