
Monday, 10 March 2025
Not actually yearly round up of film locations

Sunday, 29 December 2024
Top 10 Films of 2024 - Now with Explanations
Sunday, 22 December 2024
Top 10 Films of 2024
My usual end of the year list of the top 10 films. Explanations coming in a week.
1 - Monkey Man
2 - Kneecap
3 - The Beekeeper
4 - The Count of Monte Cristo
5 - Kalki 2898 AD
6 - Furiosa
7 - Dune 2
8 - Argylle
9 - The Fall Guy
10 - Venom 3
Monday, 8 January 2024
My top 10 films of 2023 - now with explanations
Monday, 1 January 2024
My top 10 films of 2023
As usual, this top 10 is just the new films this year (which does somewhat give away that I will be talking a lot about at least one not-new film in the expanded post with my reasonings).
I have moved everything from 6-11 of these round every time I've written this list so some of them might change again.
The film that didn't make the top 10 of the 11 films I saw in 2011 is Napoleon, which was every bit as bad as you have been told, but was visually better than most of the other films.
I can only truly recommend the top 2 films (don't get me wrong, I loved Across the Spiderverse, but I do not approve of cliffhangers). I enjoyed everything down to 6, and and am willing to admit the virtues of everything down to 8.
1 - Polite Society
2 - Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning
3 - Across the Spiderverse
4 - Guardians 3
5 - Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem
6 - Antman and the Wasp: Quantumania
7 - Indiana Jones 5
8 - Dungeons and Dragons
9 - John Wick 4
10 - Three Musketeers: D'Artagnan/Three Musketeers: Milady
Thursday, 2 February 2023
Film Review - Blinded by the Light
Wednesday, 18 January 2023
Film Review - Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw
This film does not hang together well.
If that's a problem for you; this is not the film for you.
This said, if you came into a film co-billing Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson & Jason "The Stath" Statham, and were really needing a film that hangs together well…you have unreasonable expectations, and need to have a word with yourself.
No, run along and have a word with yourself; the rest of us have other business to which to attend.
Whether by accident or design, it feels like an otherwise unrelated film, a buddy cop film along the lines of Tango and Cash was shoehorned into a Fast & Furious shape.
Add to this the first half an hour or so where we have two unpleasant characters being unpleasant to each other and generally acting like they've got testosterone poisoning and you've got a film that quite quickly teeters over onto the "no" side of the "yes/no" pile.
Sudden unexpected Ryan Reynolds does not help its standing.
It does settle down after the first half hour and becomes watchable if your pleasures are CGI action adventure-y.
There are some nice character touches. Vanessa Kirby and Helen Mirren are their usual excellent selves, and Eddie Marsan's not-so-evil scientist going HAM with a flamethrower stirs something deep in my soul, but the film's basically a waste of Idris Elba which is a terrible shame.
Come to think of it, when was the last time Idiris Elba wasn't wasted? Thor 3? Maybe?
Having read up on the film to write this, I have discovered that the film was David Leitch-directed goodness which explains why the fight scenes are so good.
The stunt people earned their money, there's a motorbike stunt towards the start in particular that is just *chef's kiss*.
The continuity department did not earn their money. I'm not just talking about the part of the film where the characters are said to be landing in one country but the on-screen sign is for a city in another country, but also mid-scene watch switches that are so obvious even little old me, infamously oblivious to that sort of thing, notices.
There's lot of little moments that destroy believability, not least that Hobbs & Shaw takes place in a post-apocalyptic hellscape of augmented super soldiers, nanoviruses, and Samoa apparently never having discovered rugby.
One of these things is more unbelievable than the others, and it's not the super soldiers.
Now probably part of that is that none of the film was filmed in Samoa, it was filmed in Hawaii. While I am aware that the concept of Samoan brotherhood espoused by the film's characters is about people not places, and the large Samoan diaspora in Hawaii, if you're going to have characters spend so much time talking about the glory of Samoa, at least help their economy out by filming there.
Overall, the bits that don't work are the bits that connect it to Fast and Furious, which I think strengthens my feeling that it was based on an unrelated script and they've just smooshed it in.
The main problem is [Jason Statham's character's name] Deckard Shaw He gets a name when he stops basically being Jason Statham. I will never forgive him for killing Han, and I don't care how they have since retconned that. At the time, he was still responsible and it remains unforgivable.
If you like mindless explosions, it's not bad, but even in that genre, it's at best mid-range.
If you want to watch The Rock, watch "The Rundown/Welcome to the Jungle"; if you want to watch Jason Statham, watch "Hummingbird" (which proves he can act if he's bothered to).
In neither of those films are we subjected to a hellscape where Samoa doesn't have rugby.
Wednesday, 11 January 2023
My top 9 films of 2022 - Once more, with explanations
You'll notice this top 10 is lacking one film. That's because I didn't see 10 new releases in 2022. The cinema had two things working against it in summer, excellent weather and the Commonwealth Games, and then the end of November/start of December when I would normally have caught up, I was taken out by the cold that knocked me sideways for 3 weeks (yes, it was just a cold, no, I have no explanation).
This means I've not seen Black Panther 2 yet, which I aim to remedy shortly. I doubt we're going to have excellent weather two years in a row, so hopefully 2023 will see me watching more films in the cinema.
I am applying my usual 4 criteria:
a – did the film do what it set out to do?
b – did it use its resources to its best ability? A £250,000 film is not going to have as good explosions as a £25,000,000 film, or it shouldn’t, and if it does, there’s something wrong with the £25,000,000 film. Basically, it's a technical merit score.
c – Intellectual satisfaction – does the film’s plot pull some really stupid move at the last moment? Does the plot rely on characters being more stupid than they are?
d – Does this work as a whole? Did it work for me? I am aware that this is the most subjective of subjective criteria!
1 - Cyrano
I cried for three quarters of this film. I am not sure I can recommend it more than that (matters were not helped by me knowing what happens next).
Sure, I have opinions on some of the changes and the marketing, but it's a joy.
(Also, I will never forgive various awards ceremonies for not giving "Wherever I Fall" something - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHo3w5ORcdY)
2 - Parallel Mothers
The thing I like about Almodovar is he writes woman who are real in all the best, jagged ways. I have no idea what they'll do next.
I know some people find him a little too much but this is one of his good ones.
3 - Bad Guys
This is an absolute joyous delight of a film.
I love Snake the most, of course I do, and this deeply stupid joke (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_inDxb7wQ-Q) got the second biggest belly laugh of the year out me.
I'm cheating slightly, because I saw this on an aeroplane, but despite a 24 hour delay to the flight, it still made me smile so much. The lady who sat next to me would also like to add her vote.
That's how good it is - it makes jetlagged strangers talk to each other.
4 - Bullet Train
D wanted to see a stupid film to keep him amused for a couple of hours. This filled that gap.
Is it good? I don't know. But it is enjoyable.
The Boomslang's character card got the biggest belly laugh of the year.
5 - Everything Everywhere All At Once
This one is actually probably me being the problem. Like, I love the idea of it, and the execution of it (and the rock universe), but mindless positivity annoys me as much as mindless negativity.
6 - Dr Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
Skipping all my spoilery comments, this was a fun film, even if it's yet another example of Strange being used as the springboard for other people's films rather than getting one of his own. (I still want Strange vs Mordo. I am never getting Strange vs Mordo. I refuse to accept this.)
7 - Spiderman: No Way Home
I am the problem with this. Nine tenths of this is solid, it's just the remaining tenth annoys me to beyond reason. And yes, it's to do with the not-quite-avunculicide.
8 - Thor: Love and Thunder
I appreciate Taika Waititi's attempt to do a Brechtian superhero film. Even if it didn't work, I appreciate the attempt. I am also deeply amused that, the things I didn't like about Thor: Ragnarok, that I got told I was being a spoilsport about, are the things everyone else who loved Ragnarok hated about Love and Thunder.
Also - killer bunny!
9 - Uncharted
This was just bad. At some point, Hollywood will have to realise that a tragic backstory does not equal characterisation.
It's a film that features a battle between airborne pirate ships and it's still the worst film I saw in the cinema last year by some way, that is how bad it is.
Wednesday, 4 January 2023
My top 9 films of 2022
Normally I start with just a before posting the explanations a week later because I'm running out of the door to get home for Christmas. Due to everything, this is a list only for the time being because I am rushing back from Christmas.
I am reasonably sure that when I write the full version, none of the numbers will change.
I recommend everything down to 3. 4 and 5 require you to be in the mood. 6 is passable (actually enjoyed it more than Everything Everywhere All At Once but it's also a much easier film to watch). 7, I am probably the problem. 8, I know what they were going for, they missed. 9 is just appalling (except one bit).
1 - Cyrano
2 - Parallel Mothers
3 - Bad Guys
4 - Bullet Train
5 - Everything Everywhere All At Once
6 - Dr Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
7 - Spiderman: No Way Home
8 - Thor: Love and Thunder
9 - Uncharted
Wednesday, 24 August 2022
X Marks The Spot - A Ranking of the X-Men films
Monday, 15 August 2022
Film Review - X-Men: Dark Phoenix
Spoilers throughout
With Dark Phoenix I find myself torn because I am not sure how much of my dislike of the film was it being bad, and how much of my dislike is how close it came to being better.
I'll quickly skim through the bits I liked - Kurt being the loveliest (even if Kodi McPhee's accent continues to be made of LOL), Genosha not starting in (hell)fire and the film getting me to shout at Charles the way it wanted me to (even if I don't actually believe in the film's solution to the problem, mostly because Hank does not have the personality to be a headmaster and no-one else is alive or around).
The largest part of the problem was the film spent so long on action scenes that went nowhere that there was no time for character bits. Now that was fine for Xavier and Magneto where we know them well enough, but it's a problem for the characters, or versions of these characters, that we've barely met like this Scott Summers and this Jean Grey.
Jean is the one who suffers the most from this overweighting of action over character. Sophie Turner does amazingly well with nothing, Jean's dialogue being the same three lines on repeat all the way through.
I'd accepted that one of my bluesome twosome was not going to make it out alive, and was just happy it wasn't both of them. Hank suffers a lot from having nothing to do, with a lot of the rage reaction he ought to have being given to Magneto instead. I'm not sure if that's because it's more expensive to pay for the blue furry special effects than Michael Fassbender's wages or what, but it was annoying.
The other person who got to have manpain over the suffering of the female characters rather than be useful is Scott. Now I am miffed because they have finally made a film where Scott gets something to do … and they have given the role to someone with the range of a wooden spoon. The one poor choice the X-Men casting directors have made over 10 films really broke part of the heart of this film. I didn't believe in anything Scott was going through.
But the worst thing about the film is that they finally had a perfect Emma Frost and they made her a space alien for no good reason. I don't even like Emma Frost but Jessica Chastain in the scene they used in the trailer was perfect, all slinky evil and seducing Jean to the darkside; the White Queen of the Hellfire Club writ cinema screen large. Oh, how I would have love the film that scene was from. But no, we got random alien Emma instead.
And that's the point, if they'd wanted aliens there is a Phoenix Force plus aliens story. It's called the Dark Phoenix story - you know the comics arc this film is named for. It's a fantastic story, with aliens, but no Emma Frost. Just make Jessica Chastain Deathbird and have her be the power-mad dictator instead of D'Ken. Or do the Hellfire Club story properly. Do not mix and match and end up with sludge!
(Like I said, I would be happier with this if that one scene hadn't given me perfect Hellfire Club Frostie)
Overall, that’s why the film doesn’t work. It tries to be all things to everyone and ends up missing important things about all of the characters.
Wednesday, 26 January 2022
John Wick: Parabellum nearly got me punched in the face
Wednesday, 12 January 2022
Set of Six - Which six films would I pick for a Marvel film marathon to lead into Endgame
Wednesday, 29 December 2021
Top 10 films I saw in the cinema in 2021
Wednesday, 22 December 2021
Avengers: Endgame
Review is spoiler-ridden (complete with a small spoiler for Dark Knight Rises). And also high-pitched and squeaky in parts.
Friend C didn't like Infinity War, but she admitted that might have been because she felt there wasn't enough Steve Rogers. Similarly, I'm not sure how much of my ambivalence to Endgame is because I didn't like what they did with Thor who is my favourite.
In my Infinity War review, I said that Thor was running on fumes and I hoped someone would be there to catch him when he fell. And there wasn't, and there was much to like about how they handled it:
1) that it wasn't that Korg et al. weren't trying, it was that they just weren't capable of providing the support Thor needed,
2) that scene where Thor snaps and chops Thanos's head off even though he knows it will accomplish nothing, because he is beyond doing anything but that
3) the scene with Frigga, because of course he's worried that he's not worthy anymore, and of course she realises that something terrible has happened, probably to her, and immediately stops him from telling her what happened and then he has to let her go to her death despite knowing that it's going to happen and !!!
So what am I not happy about with regard to Thor? Mostly the idea that someone who is over-eating to cope with what appears to be a major case of depression (because the thing we know to be his literal worst nightmare [thank you Age of Ultron] has happened to him) is a figure of fun because "hur hur he fat now". In defence of how they handled it, at least one person at work thought I was being too harsh on them and they weren't treating him as a figure of fun.
Secondly, how they handled his fat. "OMG, Thor is so out of shape now, he looks like ... people who play rugby at international level". I mean, he's solid, but his "out of shape"/fat-suit is better than most of us will look at any point. Are they trying to give people complexes?
I think that the thing I really don't like is that the arc of Thor's story in his films is "that with great power comes great responsibility" and this film ends with him rejecting his responsibilities, and yes, it probably is the after-effects of everything, and would be justifiable, but after 3 films of character growth going one way, it feels like a huge step back. (I know, I know, in Taika we trust.)
All that being said, the film still made me cry, for reasons I will go into later, so it still got to me.
The plot was very much an excuse plot, in the traditional style, but they did a good job of giving everyone something to do, especially if you consider the two films as one unit.
Because there's so much going on, a few people are going to get some short shrift in this review. For instance, Hulk (where they seem to have solved the 'Bruce doesn't want to Hulk out but the audience is waiting for it' problem), and Rhodey, which upsets me because Rhodey never gets enough love. Also Nebula, who is the unwitting cause of disaster, in a way that plays into how we first saw her and all the other terrible things Thanos has done. (Thanos isn't getting much either but listen, my Infinity War review was mostly raving about Thanos and Josh Brolin so ... Although he is very good in the scene at the start where Thanos doesn't care if he lives or dies because he's already won.).
With those apologies out of the way, let me start with the parts of the film I will spend too many words on.
1 - Hawkeye and Black Widow (or, in short, keyboard smash, the superhero film). I mean, I'm absolutely convinced that Nat knew where he was all along and spent half her time making sure he was a step and a half ahead of Rhodey, because she feels she owes him for trusting her. Then the moment they come up with a possible way of going back, Hawkeye is the first to volunteer, then he sees the kids and you're like "no, don't talk to them, don't touch them, you will break the space time continuum, and ruin your chances at happiness forever." And then he gets time-snapped back just before he can, and it's worse, somehow it's worse.
And then they get sent to Vormir. And it's horrible. Whoever would have got sent there, it would be horrible. But with some of the others you could at least go "fine." Thor, the position he's in, fine. Cap - fine. Iron Man - fine. But not these two. Not when the thing that has to happen to get the soul stone has to happen and they're best friends and no!
Can I reiterate that I was at "no!" the minute I realised they had been sent to Vormir.
And I did not retreat from "no!" at any point.
It was done perfectly. Every bit from the moment they realised that for this plan to work, one of them needed to die onwards. The fact that both their first thoughts were not "how do I save myself", but "how do I make sure it's me that ends up at the bottom of the rock". That they both tried to lie to the other one about that being their main thought to try to prevent the other one from being guilty and that neither of them convinced the other one for even a nano-second.
The fight, and the way it called back to Avengers Assemble, and the utter trust between them because they were fighting damn hard to make the other one be the one to survive and then that moment where Nat said, "let me make this choice" (or thereabouts). She is a most-excellent godparent (I also have the problem that I was brought up to believe that in that situation, that's what the godparent is supposed to do, and I discovered that ... I have been socialised differently to other people).
And oh, Nat and Hawkeye and !!!!
2 - Steve Rogers - okay, so the thing I find really interesting about Steve Rogers in the film actually has very little to do with Steve Rogers, but I am fascinated by the response to his choice, and how similar it is to the reaction people had to Bruce Wayne's choice at the end of Dark Knight Rises. The films are getting to the question of "how much can we expect from our heroes?", and where is the line between "with great power comes great responsibility" and a hero's right to some kind of life outside superheroism. Then there's this interesting disconnect between an online generation who are supposed to be all "look after yourself, self-care is important," but not extending that to this sort of character, and obviously, this is fiction, but ooh, that's interesting to me.
Plus, it's not like he and Peggy hiding in backrooms and knitting in the altered past. (I was reasonably sure that the film itself hinted at a lack of hiding, and I think Black Widow confirmed it.) [Insert rant about audiences having no whatever-the-film-equivalent-of-reading-comprehension-is]
Cap was also involved in one of the scenes that made it clear that Marvel have written themselves some very nice loopholes if they need to reset, which is sensible.
I think he told Bucky what he was up to before he left, there is no other way of reading that scene.
3 - Gamorra - Talking about Vormir *and* giving themselves loopholes. On the other hand, ack, a Gamorra who hasn't had a chance to become the Gamorra we know and love having to cope with that crew who, you know, love her and miss her and will, accidentally because they are morons, remind her that she is not the Gamorra they know and love at least 3 times a day. In between her and the adventures of Drax and a recovering Pirate Angel Baby I am looking forward to Guardians of the Galaxy 3.
4 - Doctor Strange - okay so I have to admit I was mean about Benedict Cumberbatch's American accent as Doctor Strange, coming as it does via Cornwall. I shouldn't have been, because while the accent still has its Truro moments, he nailed the rest of it. Because there's this moment when you realise the reason why he was running through so many versions of time to find the least worst one in Infinity War wasn't to find one where they all lived but to find one where Thanos was defeated and the least of them died. And it makes sense, *for him as a character* and builds on his film, because Strange really is no kill in that, even against villain's minion number 3. (Also, it was interesting that all of the sorcerers only use magic for shields and general defence when they get spirited back at the end).
Which all leads to *that* moment where Doc Strange looks at Tony and Tony looks at him and they both know that this is the least worst way, and Tony knows that Doc Strange would not have suggested it had there been any other way, and Doc Strange also knows that Tony would rather be the dead one rather than Peter. I'm wondering if that's the unspoken agreement, had the "remains dead" person been Thor, for instance, I'm not sure Tony would have agreed, and I'm not sure that that Doc Strange would have asked. I think there is something about Peter's youth, and civillian status.
Of course, that all leads me to person 5 - Iron Man. I have my usual reservations, mostly that they keep telling rather than showing how great Tony Stark is. Like the bit with "oh, he's so brave risking his future with his wife and daughter," somehow missing that Scott Lang is willing to risk it too and he has a lovely daughter also. Or, "he's so clever," when he's building on stuff that Hank Pym, Janet van Dyne and Bruce Banner have done.
It makes sense that it's him though, because he's the one that we started the journey with.
It wasn't actually Tony's death that made me cry, because, let's be honest, the way Tony Stark is, his story was never going to end any other way.
No, the bits that got me were that scene where all our heroes are arrayed and all the villains are arrayed on the other side, and there is a blasted plain and ... I read that comic. Not that exact comic no, but how many of the comics I grew up with had that as their end fight. I was keeping it together until T-Challa stepped through one of the sorcerers's portals and then I was gone. Because the Avengers assembled and the Earth is defended and I am hopeless.
Then I tidied myself up until Happy asked Morgan what she wanted and she said a burger. And oh Morgan, you have a superhero by your side in Happy, one of the best, superpowers be damned.
Separately, because, as much this wave of films had to finish with Iron Man, because we started with him, none of this would have been possible if the first Iron Man film hadn't been so good. It might be hard to believe but no one believed that these films would ever grow into the all-devouring mega-phenomenon they have become. So thanks, Jon Favreau, on behalf of me now, me a couple of years ago when I really did need the escapism, and 13 year old me who would have been bowled over to see her comics on the big screen.
Wednesday, 1 December 2021
Yearly Film Location Post
Yes, this was supposed to be posted in August but I really wasn't joking when I said my offline life has been busy.
This covers films up to 12th November 2017.
There have been very few changes since the last of these posts.
Looking at all locations, including fictional ones, the US, UK and France make up just over 50% (50.2%) of film locations.
If I limit it to real world locations - US and UK make up just under 50% (49.5%). That remaining 0.5 sliver of the half is films set in France.
Looking at UK-set films, the films are still predominantly set in England (87.9%).
Wednesday, 25 August 2021
Missing Link (2019 Film)
It's a Laika film so I presume I don't need to say that the production itself was amazing and beautifully done.
I really liked Mr. Link himself, the boat chase and Gamu. I laughed liked a drain at the Yeti Leader shouting "The people we don't want here are leaving! Force them to stay!" and the misadventures of Stenk, but the parts didn't really mesh into a satisfying whole for me. It felt like the characters were being squashed into the story rather than what they do flowing from who they are.
Fun film but not as good as it could have been - or I just have unnecessarily high expectations for Laika films.
Wednesday, 18 August 2021
Captain Marvel
In which I am the problem, not the film.
- The bad guy has a squad of henchpeople whose presence or absence wouldn't affect the film.
- The bad guy is defeated easily, too easily to be satisfying (yes I know Yon-Rog is supposed to be the "Debate Me" guys, but one punch is a lousy way to end a climactic battle).
Wednesday, 19 May 2021
Black Widow
Despite how the rest of this post sounds, I will be watching the Black Widow movie in the cinema. Because you know, explosions and Natasha Romanov (and Rachel Weisz).
The trailers however do not match up to the film I imagined when I heard the words "will also star Rachel Weisz". Because the film in my dreams (let's be honest *of* my dreams) when I hear that is very different. It has Rachel Weisz as one of the people who trains a teenage (almost Red Room graduate) Natasha, and she is nasty and horrible and beautiful, charming and alluring all at once. She's the prototypical Black Widow.
She's also Natasha's handler/co-agent for her first real mission (basically, I want comparisons drawn to Hawkeye in absentia). Somehow, Weisz's character saves Natasha's life and then goes rogue. (Or saves her life from an enemy, stabs her to incapacitate her and then goes rogue), and Natasha has to hunt her down. I'm not sure which reason for defection would be better, for the money or to the side of good. For the money would be a more personal betrayal, but to the side of good has the possibility of being part of Black Widow's origin story.
Or, Weisz's character never goes rogue, but goes into sleeper agent mode instead, living as an American housewife. Then, she's reactivated after Natasha joins SHIELD, because the bad guys want to bring Natasha down. This all happens early enough that Natasha's loyalties are still in doubt (to everyone but Fury and Hawkeye) and Natasha has to hunt her down.
There's so much potential for twisty and dark and "who am I? Who can I be?" that they don't seem to be using.
They have two solid actresses, why don't they let them do more than (probably enjoyable) kaboomery.
Wednesday, 14 April 2021
Out of Blue
I'm going to start at the end.
When I came back from watching "Out of Blue" at the cinema I looked it up on Wikipedia, and found out that it's based on a book (Night Train by Martin Amis), and that book is a parody. Which makes the film make so much more sense. Unfortunately, the film lacked that reflexive self-aware quality of good parody. There's a beautiful quote from the Torygraph that I think sums the film up perfectly - "This New Orleans-set detective thriller from Carol Morley pulls off an undesirable yet weirdly impressive coup: the twist ending to its murder mystery is somehow simultaneously preposterous and obvious, like a clown car parping and swerving its way towards you from the far end of an airstrip."That statement is true of everything that happens in the film. You think, oh, they're using this tired trope in this really unsubtle way to subvert it. And then they don't. It's not just one tired trope, it's all of them. In sequence. In obvious sequence.
It wouldn't be so bad, I mean basic thrillers are ten-a-penny, yeah, they're not good, but they're not bothersome either, they're Sunday-afternoon-plans-have-washed-out films. But this film keeps putting on these airs and graces, all "I am a serious film, making serious statements. I AM ART!" when it's really not. It tries to be clever and turns out dumb. Also the physics is terrible. But I suspect that's deliberate, because the physics they use is all trope-y and we're back to "tired trope played straight."
It's a waste of some lovely cinematography and a good soundtrack. And some solid performances. Patricia Clarkson as Mike Hoolihan gives enough mystery and enigmatic to be engaging despite being all but one of the hard-bitten female detective clichés. Toby Jones is Toby Jones so you know he's good. Aaron Tveit's Detective Silvero does a good job of sleazy and sinister ... like every other male character. Basically, the female characters suffer and the men are sleazy and sinister. It's very thin that way.
It's one of those rare films I'd actually disrecommend.