Sunday, 29 December 2024

Top 10 Films of 2024 - Now with Explanations

My "not first released in 2024" option is Galaxy Quest, which I saw at the Electric, about two weeks before it closed. Which was a real shock! The owner was perpetually threatening to close it but hadn't ever (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clm7nnyx2d5o). It means I really need to get myself more organised to actually get back to going to the Mockingbird (https://mockingbirdcinema.com/MockingbirdCinema.dll/Home) when I get the chance. 

For films released this year, I am applying my usual 4 criteria: 
a – did the film do what it set out to do? 
b – did it use its resources to its best ability? A £250,000 film is not going to have as good explosions as a £25,000,000 film, or it shouldn’t, and if it does, there’s something wrong with the £25,000,000 film. Basically, it's a technical merit score. 
c – Intellectual satisfaction – does the film’s plot pull some really stupid move at the last moment? Does the plot rely on characters being more stupid than they are? 
d – Does this work as a whole? Did it work for me? I am aware that this is the most subjective of subjective criteria! 

I saw 13 films this year, 12 in the cinema and one on a plane, because the cinema-to-plane turnaround time is ridiculous nowadays. The bottom 3, which didn't make the top 10, can all be missed quite happily. Of the 10 here, I can find something to recommend in everything down to 9, while I'd say the top 4 are actively good and Kalki 2898 AD is intriguing but that might be my lack of knowledge. 

1 - Monkey Man - If we could give Dev Patel all the money he wants to make any film he wants, I would be so grateful. This was marvellous. Fills my need for arthouse violence exactly. 

2 - Kneecap - I am going to caveat this one. How do you feel about about swearing, drink and drugs? If any of the above are not your thing, please skip. The politics is also ... intriguing (let's be honest, they go with 'Band banned by the UK gov' for a reason). (The politics is a whole section of the full review, a long section.) 

On the other hand, other than 'oh heck, Fassbender is old enough to be playing parents', this was good. Openly, 'our story as told by a drunk', in the best sense, and DJ Provai can act (the other two, not so much but not worse than many pro-actors). 

3 - The Beekeeper - Kurt Wimmer is a member of the Garth Marenghi school of writing, where subtext is for cowards. His style really works for me. The Beekeeper is a very straightforward story of good guys, bad guys, necessary bad guys and a lot of violence. They fill this out by casting a bunch of British actors in random roles (and have Josh Hutcherson being the sleaziest sleaze ever). 

Catnip for me. 

4 - The Count of Monte Cristo - It needed to be a mini-series. But I enjoyed what there was. Pierre Niney was excellent, I did not expect to fall for Andrea Calcavetti quite that hard and loved how they did Dantes acting as the Count. 

5 - Kalki 2898 AD - The full story of how I ended up watching this will wait until the write up. Safe to say it was longer than expected, and could have done with some judicious cutting. On the other hand it felt very fresh, although how much of that is me not knowing the Mahabharata, I do not know. (It is a gap I am planning on fixing eventually) 

I do find it interesting that 4 out of my top 5 are not English as their main language. Monkey Man and Kneecap (and the Count, to an extent) are also good at the way people who use more than language use their languages and flow between them. 

6 - Furiosa - It wasn't as good as Fury Road (but that's a very high bar), and it did make Furiosa far too nice and cut-out how she was supporting Immortan Joe. But the images were still awesome and it does interesting things with revenge. 

7 - Dune 2 - I am the problem with this. I acknowledge this. But there are three scenes I demand in any adaptation of this part of the book, and it whiffs all of them. I grant there's reasons for one of them - can I recommend SelenaK's review here - https://selenak.dreamwidth.org/1573791.html? - but I still want those scenes. 

8 - Argylle - It has problems. For spoilery reasons, Bryce Dallas Howard is mildly miscast, but she's not miscast for the more important part. I would have re-edited several of the scenes that ran too long. But it's pleasingly silly, and does some fun things. 

9 - The Fall Guy - This is probably better than Argylle, I just do not vibe with Ryan Gosling. The parts that are David Leitch's love letter to stunt guys, and any part that features Winston Duke, are absolute love, mind you. 

10 - Venom 3 

Everything above 10 has some redeeming feature. Films 10-13 have almost none of these. Venom 3 comes the top of them because while it is a pointless sequel (like film 11), I enjoyed it more than 11. Unlike film 12, I didn't consider that it might have been written by AI, because AI would be more evenly-toned. Unlike film 13, it didn't make me drunkenly rant at L, because it's just so wrong. 

Also, it did have Venom Horse and Mrs Chen. 

And Venom Penguin!

Tuesday, 24 December 2024

Saints Ahoy! - Game 16 and the season to date (and an example of visualisation helps spot errors)

Saints beat London Broncos 52 - 6, with Percival converting 8/9 tries - https://www.saintsrlfc.com/matches/2024/first-team/london-broncos-v-saints-2024-06-16/ 

On the other hand, Makinson limped off within the first 10 minutes with a leg injury. As a team, we're not so good without him and he's part of the spine of our team.

Who scored for Saints in game 16?   Bar chart showing point-scoring moments for St. Helens players in the 16th game.  Percival is on top with 9 point-scoring moments (8 conversions and one try), followed by Clark with 3, then Blake with 2, and Mbye, Hurrell and Dodd with one each. Percival scored a try as well as the 8 conversions, hence his domination. 

It was the "who scored" chart that made me notice that 1) I'd missed Percival's conversion of his own try and then the "present when conceded in game 16" that made me notice I'd accidentally duplicated Bell after he'd gone off for Sam Royle and then come back on to replace Davies when he went off for his HIA (head injury assessment). 

I also learnt that Daryl Clark has earned his own song, which the Saints sing to "Dancing in the Dark". Given he is replacing one of the players generally regarded as one of our greatest ever (https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/james-roby-stays-with-st-helens-as-retired-legend-details-his-new-wide-ranging-role), I think he's doing well. 

London Broncos did better the second time they played Saints in 2024 (https://fulltimesportsfan.wordpress.com/2024/02/21/saints-ahoy-rugby-league-data-visualisation-2024/), actually scoring this time, but in the last 2 minutes. Bar chart showing which teams scored against St Helens.  Hull KR have scored the most, but there are several teams that did not score any points and they are not on the chart. There is still no pattern to when Saints score up to the end of game 16. Bar chart - there is no pattern to where the peaks are.  It looks like a city skyline. There is a pattern to when they concede, although this time they avoided conceding in minutes 9-11. Bar chart of when Saints concede.  There is one obvious peak in minutes 9-11 made less obvious by minute 9 being at the end.  Still not found a way of stopping the visualisation doing that.  There is not a peak, but a concentration of point scoring moments, between minutes 71 and 80. 

So we concede either just after the first 10 or in the last 10 minutes. 

Who is present when Saints score? Who is present when Saints score.  Welsby is the most present for all 142.  He is a long way ahead of the next two, Blake and Hurrell.  Then there is a drop off to the next group around for 100-110 point-scoring moments, then another drop to players present for 90-95, then another cluster at around 80, then a long slow decline down to the players present for the least point-scoring moments, who Paasi, Ritson and Royle. Welsby is the only ever present, there for all 142 point scoring moments. Makinson missing this game, or all but the first 5 minutes, has dropped him into the middle of the pack. 

The "Who is present when Saints score" matrix looks like this. There is now a clear difference between the players in the pale area (Ritson, Royle, Paasi, Stephens, Davies, Knowles, Walmsley, Wingfield) who have been injured, and those in the darker areas, who nicely make a 17 players, the number of players on a match day squad.  They are Welsby, Hurrell, Blake, Whitley, Batchelor, Bennison, Dodd, Percival, Lomax, Bell, Clark, Sironen, Mbye, Matautia, Lees and Delaney. 

I like that the darker area does cover 17 players who would make a decent match day squad. They are Welsby, Hurrell, Blake, Whitley, Batchelor, Bennison, Dodd, Percival, Lomax, Bell, Clark, Sironen, Mbye, Mata'utia, Lees and Delaney. 

The network diagram looks like this: There are 17 players in the centre, they are Welsby, Hurrell, Blake, Whitley, Batchelor, Bennison, Dodd, Percival, Lomax, Bell, Clark, Sironen, Mbye, Matautia, Lees and Delaney.  Only 4 of the less frequently together players make the network diagram, they are Stephens, sticking out on the right, Davies, sticking out of the bottom, Wingfield, bottom left, and Walmsley, top right. 

It pleases me that the 17 players are also those in the centre of the network diagram. Not sure why only 4 of the less frequently present players are in the diagram (Stephens, Davies, Wingfield and Walmsley) but they are the most frequently present of the infrequents so I presume it's that. 

How about players present when Saints concede? There is a much steeper drop off in this diagram than the equivalent scoring one.  Welsby is still on top, he really has been there all the time.  Paasi, only back for a couple of matches, and used sparingly in them, is present for the least. Welsby is top of this one too, because he really is ever present. The players that follow him are in a different order. I suspect that either concede or scored will hit another big number shortly so the orders can be compared. 

The steeper drop off in the "concession moments present for" diagram is also reflected in the matrix diagram. In this diagram, the pale, less-often-present-together area includes Paasi, Davies, Royle, Wingfield, Walmsley, Ritson, Lees and Mbye.  The darker area includes Welsby, Dodd, Matautia, Blake, Hurrell, Lomax, Delaney, Makinson, Clark, Bell, Bennison, Sironen, Whitley, Percival, Batchelor and Knowles. There are only 16 players in the darkest area. They are Welsby, Dodd, Mata'utia, Blake, Hurrell, Lomax, Delaney, Makinson, Clark, Bell, Bennison, Sironen, Whitley, Percival, Batchelor and Knowles. I think Lees misses out because he was off the pitch because of yellow cards for several point-concessions. 

The network graph is less tightly packed. This network graph has six players in the centre, Matautia, Blake, Dodd, Hurrell, Clark, Welsby, then 12 players around them in a sort of shield shape.  Sticking out are Ritson, at the top, Wingfield, bottom right, Walmsley, bottom left. 

It's those 16 again, because they are closely related, and this time it's Ritson, Wingfield and Walmsley that are present from the pale group.

Monday, 23 December 2024

Formula 1 - Canadian Grand Prix 2024

I think this is the one where it became really apparent that the big fight was going to be Norris vs Verstappen*.  As an F1 fan, it's good when there is actual racing, as a Ferrari fan, I'd like it to have been Ferrari but c'est la vie.  Things that do prevent Ferrari success include a double DNF.

I don't hold the team responsible for racing incidents and driver errors, which collided in much the same way Albon and Sainz did, but maybe avoid power unit issues!!!

*I mean I knew Russell would fight back if pushed by Verstappen but at the time the Mercedes wasn't near enough for that to matter.

Sunday, 22 December 2024

Top 10 Films of 2024

 My usual end of the year list of the top 10 films. Explanations coming in a week.


1 - Monkey Man
2 - Kneecap
3 - The Beekeeper
4 - The Count of Monte Cristo
5 - Kalki 2898 AD
6 - Furiosa
7 - Dune 2
8 - Argylle
9 - The Fall Guy
10 - Venom 3