Before all the noise about Mercedes not having the best car starts, it was good enough to help Hamilton from ninth to second within 27 laps, and he's still in the lead of the Drivers' World Championship, so let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Ferrari managed to finish fourth and fifth, which is almost acceptable. Since that is roughly where Leclerc was last year, I am suggesting that the driver of the second car might have been letting the side down. On the other hand, Ferrari, still only in fourth place in the Constructors's Championship, so no cookies yet.
No red cards either, although if there is a repeat of the radio issues that plagued Leclerc, there may be one. Consider this to be a yellow card for that offence, Ferrari.
Wednesday, 21 April 2021
F1 2021 - Emilia Romagna Grand Prix
Wednesday, 14 April 2021
Out of Blue
I'm going to start at the end.
When I came back from watching "Out of Blue" at the cinema I looked it up on Wikipedia, and found out that it's based on a book (Night Train by Martin Amis), and that book is a parody. Which makes the film make so much more sense. Unfortunately, the film lacked that reflexive self-aware quality of good parody. There's a beautiful quote from the Torygraph that I think sums the film up perfectly - "This New Orleans-set detective thriller from Carol Morley pulls off an undesirable yet weirdly impressive coup: the twist ending to its murder mystery is somehow simultaneously preposterous and obvious, like a clown car parping and swerving its way towards you from the far end of an airstrip."That statement is true of everything that happens in the film. You think, oh, they're using this tired trope in this really unsubtle way to subvert it. And then they don't. It's not just one tired trope, it's all of them. In sequence. In obvious sequence.
It wouldn't be so bad, I mean basic thrillers are ten-a-penny, yeah, they're not good, but they're not bothersome either, they're Sunday-afternoon-plans-have-washed-out films. But this film keeps putting on these airs and graces, all "I am a serious film, making serious statements. I AM ART!" when it's really not. It tries to be clever and turns out dumb. Also the physics is terrible. But I suspect that's deliberate, because the physics they use is all trope-y and we're back to "tired trope played straight."
It's a waste of some lovely cinematography and a good soundtrack. And some solid performances. Patricia Clarkson as Mike Hoolihan gives enough mystery and enigmatic to be engaging despite being all but one of the hard-bitten female detective clichés. Toby Jones is Toby Jones so you know he's good. Aaron Tveit's Detective Silvero does a good job of sleazy and sinister ... like every other male character. Basically, the female characters suffer and the men are sleazy and sinister. It's very thin that way.
It's one of those rare films I'd actually disrecommend.
Wednesday, 7 April 2021
Do February's lead articles obey Benford's Law?
Benford's Law gains its power with larger numbers, and I started my Benford's law project in the shortest month. I don't think these things through, do I? But you have to start somewhere.
The 28 daily news articles contained 436 numbers written as digits (~15 per day).
3 and 7 are found pretty much exactly as often as expected. 1 is over represented.
If you add together the sum of all the values of (observed-expected)squared, all divided by the expected, the calculated test statistic is 8.6.
The critical chi squared value for 9 items with only one line is ~ 15.507
The test statistic smaller than the critical value therefore the difference is not significant. This data does not disobey Benford's Law.*
*That noise is L shouting "obey is the word you want" but to me there's a difference between 'stats show x' and 'stats show not x' and to me, these show 'do not disobey'.
Wednesday, 31 March 2021
F1 2021 - Bahrain Grand Prix
There is no change to the diagram, because Ferrari were no more than competent and competence does not give you cookies. But at least there were no red cards, because the pitstop disaster happened to Mercedes.
The race itself was not as good as people are saying - whenever they do the whole "best season opener ever!!!" I want them to ask people who have been watching for more than 10 years. Red Bull were hoist on their own petard, which was pleasing because their behaviour was only one step above "Please Mrs Butler"*. On the other hand, the claims that Hamilton won in not-the-best car are a little premature given the fastest lap was set in the Mercedes.
Bahrain did, however, set the season up nicely. Bring on Imola.
* Yes, it's still one of my favourite poems.
Friday, 26 March 2021
F1's back for 2021
I try and limit myself to 1 post a week, but with both the rugby league and formula 1 coming back this week, you're getting two.
As a Formula 1 fan, I am looking forward to the new season, even if I suspect Mercedes dominance. As a Ferrari fan, I am dreading it. After last season's disaster (worst season in 40 years!), I don't see any improvement, not because testing has gone much better or worse but because nothing has changed. Except the addition of horrid green drizzle on the back of the car. I disapprove of the horrid green.
Last season I made a bingo card, and while 9/25 squares did get dabbed, the problems were mostly strategy failures, driver errors and pitstop disasters. I'm also a believer in positive reinforcement so this year's theme will be cards and cookies.
Ferrari do something bad - red card, Ferrari do something good - cookie.
They are already on one red card for the abominable green motif.
Wednesday, 24 March 2021
My entirely biased and one-sided report on the 2020 Super League Season
Wednesday, 17 March 2021
Obey Benford's - It's The Law (an introduction to my Benford's Law project)
Introduction:
Some years ago, I read the book, “How Long Is a Piece of String?: More Hidden Mathematics of Everyday Life by Rob Eastaway” (as reviewed here), and one chapter fascinated me. The chapter was chapter 12 - “Is it a fake?”, and the section that particularly caught my interest was about Benford’s Law. Excessively simplifying, in naturally occurring numbers, the leading digits will follow a distinct pattern, and will not be randomly distributed.
The expected % of leading numbers for each digit can be seen in the table below:
If you have a large naturally occurring data set that doesn’t conform to this, it tells you there are either constraints on it so that the data doesn’t cover all of the possibilities (e.g. human heights in m are will start with a 1 or a 2, no one has ever been 4 m tall) or something else is going on.
Testing this theory:
I wanted to test this out on *something*. Problem was, what? Most sports data is possibility-limited e.g. fewer goals will be scored in football the 9th or 9xths minute than would be scored in the 8th and 8xths minute, not because of the minute, but because the game stops at the 90th minute. Other data isn’t big enough. I needed a source of numbers that was large and unlimited.
Eventually, possibly in a fit of cynicism, I decided to try the leading digits of numbers reported in the news. Advantages to this plan - I can use a single, traceable data source - one article a day from the BBC news website. The BBC doesn’t tend to delete pages so if someone wanted to double check my numbers, I could give them the links.
Disadvantages to this plan - when I first attempted it, Article 50 was in the news, and skewing my results.
Having looked at the results, and realised this and a few methodological errors, and going a bit stir-crazy because of lockdown 3, I decided to try it again.
Attempt Number 2:
These were the rules I developed to try to avoid that and similar pitfalls:
1 - no numbers in names e.g. 19 in COVID-19 does not count as a leading digit
2 - no numbers from dates (I had done this originally, but worth restating)
3 - only digits written as digits. This threw up an unexpected problem - the BBC has somewhat intermittent editorial control on whether digits under 10 are written as words or numbers, and this may skew results. I’ve saved the links to the articles I’ve used to put the project together so I can go through them again if I want to (or if someone else wants to look at them).
I started on the 1st of February 2021, and will carry on till 1st of February 2022 (barring disaster). The other advantage of this system is that if I miss a day, I can fill them in with more days at the end. I will give monthly updates and running totals, plus some commentary if I have any.
Tuesday, 2 March 2021
Book Review - How Long Is a Piece of String?: More Hidden Mathematics of Everyday Life by Rob Eastaway
This reads a lot like Horrible Histories but for maths and aimed at an older audience.
I know what I'm going to say is an odd sort of complaint, but I could have done with more book. What there is is gold, but I think they could have gone further into the maths without losing their audience.
That being said I appreciate the practical ways they suggest that a reader can do to to prove the maths in the book and the links to papers which go further into the maths.Wednesday, 17 February 2021
In which I am dubious about the new sprint races
The sprint race plan intrigues me in some ways.
1 - They managed to get every team to agree! It's Formula 1, all the teams never agree on anything. Of course, it turns out that it's only an agreement in principle, which leaves plenty of room for everyone to change their minds, but at least its a start.*
2 - Often, when they bring in major rule changes, it's all or nothing. A 3-race trial of the sprint races is a really good idea, especially for something they're positioning as a big change.
3 - The choice of the races to test it at. The chosen three are the Canadian, Italian and Brazilian Grand Prix. If the idea is to bring more people in by moving qualifying to the Friday, they're reasonable choices; the Canadian Grand Prix is round a street circuit, and Monza's easy enough to get to from Milan. If someone was coming to one of those races anyway, an extra day wouldn't make that much difference in terms of accommodation. Certainly, doing this at other tracks e.g. Silverstone or Monaco, would be a lot more difficult.
Fewer people will still come on Fridays because of a nasty thing called work, but it might increase interest in the Friday sessions for TV, so both TV and the tracks themselves might get more money out of this.
Why am I focussing on the backstage stuff and the inevitable horse-trading and intrigue? Because I don't think the sprint races are going to change anything in terms of racing excitement. The teams aren't going to let it have enough points to change anything at the end of the season, there are only 3 of the spread through the whole season (21 races) and, let's be honest, that Mercedes is enough ahead that it could give the rest of the cars a one-lap head start and still win.
The (probable) lack of a pitstop means there's no way Mercedes will some how stuff one up which cuts off another possible way of them not-winning.
The only way sprint racing might change anything is either first lap chaos and there not being enough time for Mercedes to catch up. I am not expecting overtaking, because if there's (almost) no overtaking in long races, why would there be any (more) in short races?
I don't see this solving F1's problems with regard to lack of in-race action.
*I am trying to figure out if this has been done to increase viewership, to bring in more money, and if the elongated engine freeze being used to get the smaller teams onside. Which leads to the question of what are they giving Mercedes and Ferrari in exchange?
Saturday, 13 February 2021
A lack of comment on F1 sprint races and Pancakes
If, in future, F1 could not do big announcements in weeks when I am working lots of overtime, I would be obliged. Comments on Sprint Races to come when I have brain space. Here's one I wrote earlier.
Pancakes
I use Delia Smith's pancake recipe, with a couple of alterations.
- I don't use the leftover melted butter to fry the pancakes, I use sunflower oil, because I find butter-fried pancakes to be too much and sickly, to be honest.
- Because I don't have a ladle, I use 4 spoonfuls of mixture per pancake.
The pancakes come out alright, not as good as my Nan's, but alright. I am slowly learning the patience required to let them cook enough to flip. It is a process that has involved many tasty disasters.